From the Blog

Dec
13
Posted by Daniel at 5:59 pm

So on the way home from work today, I heard this story on NPR. It’s part of a series where people talk about three books on a particular subject. The subject was “impostors.” So you got told what the book was and that it was about an imposter.

That’s when the contributor started saying some nonsense:

The [figure of the] imposter shows that, especially in America, identity is up for grabs.

That sentence means nothing. It’s not true. It’s not really even analyzable as true. Sure, we can go like “Identity is up for grabs: yes/no?” But everything in that sentence is so vague, you can hardly get started. You’d have to go “What exactly do you mean by identity; what exactly do you mean by up for grabs; and how could someone’s being located on a particular plot of land (i.e., in America) have anything to do with what you just said?”

And that’s tiresome. So people don’t do it. You nod your head: “Mmhmm. Interesting. Tell us more. You are speaking with a high level of abstraction; so obviously you must (a) be intelligent and (b) have something intelligent to say.”

No. People write like this when they don’t know what they’re talking about. This is the case here.

Takeaway 1: Don’t do this.

Takeaway 2: Know what you’re talking about.

Takeaway 3: Write something intelligible.

Takeaway 4: Be smart. Don’t try to make yourself seem smart.

Dec
06

Really, she does. She’s just minimized all her windows, and there it is. It’s from last year, when they were quasi-dating. (Not actually dating, but they both knew they liked each other, and everyone else knew they liked each other, and it would have been considered bad form for either to display symptoms of like for anyone else.) It was during the homecoming pep rally. You can see Ishmael in the background in his crimson and white Judges uniform, number 7, chest-bumping the late Ben Herbert. Jael’s taking the picture; so you can’t see her, of course; but Miriam and Judah are center-frame, smiling and side-hugging, which is to say Christian, non-dating hugging, “just friends, Mom, promise” hugging.

Apparently.

“I do really wish to destroy it!” cried Frodo. “Or, well, to have it destroyed. I am not made for perilous quests. I wish I had never seen the Ring! Why did it come to me? Why was I chosen?”

“Such questions cannot be answered,” said Gandalf. “You may be sure that it was not for any merit that others did not possess: not for power or wisdom, at any rate. But you have been chosen, and you must therefore use such strength and heart and wits as you have.”

(Fellowship of the Ring, Chapter II: “The Shadow of the Past”)

Oct
31

Jude talks about “love feasts.” I Corinthians 11 talks about where folks were getting stuffed and drunk. Of course, like a ton of other things, the Corinthians were doing it wrong, but Paul nevertheless called it “the Lord’s supper.” And what were they getting wrong? They were being selfish and overdoing it. It wasn’t the thing itself that was wrong; it was their particular practicing of it. Here’s a long quote:

20 When you come together, it is not the Lord’s supper that you eat.
21 For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal. One goes hungry, another gets drunk.
22 What! Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I commend you in this? No, I will not.
23 For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread,
24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”
25 In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.
27 Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord.
28 Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup.
29 For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself.
30 That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.
31 But if we judged ourselves truly, we would not be judged.
32 But when we are judged by the Lord, we are disciplined so that we may not be condemned along with the world.
33 So then, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for one another-
34 if anyone is hungry, let him eat at home-so that when you come together it will not be for judgment. About the other things I will give directions when I come.

Does it sound to you like communion was eating a bit of cracker and a shot of grape juice? And the point wasn’t that the Corinthians had the wrong idea entirely. It wasn’t like Paul said “Hey, you guys should really just be sitting in pews and eating a cracker and throwing back 1.5oz of Welch’s finest.”

Instead, he was saying they were being selfish and really just bad folks. It’s a potluck meal. Everyone’s bringing stuff, but some folks are too poor to bring a whole lot, and some folks are bringing, like, 2 KFC family meals. And they’re eating all of it. The point of the meal, of the Lord’s Supper, is to have communion with each other and thereby with Christ. If you’re ravenous before you meet with the church, you should pre-game: eat you some Lucky Charms in the a.m. so that you don’t just destroy the whole platter of fried chicken.

Know another thing that’s great about eating together? You talk. Sure, not everything you talk about is going to be “spiritual.” Football may be discussed. But you’re getting to know each other. You’re learning about who these other people are that Christ redeemed. You’re learning how to pray for them, where they’re weak, how you can help them, and how they can help you. I know that’s the kind of thing I need to know more of. And how are you going to get that if you don’t talk to people? And what’s more conducive to that than a shared meal? (And, on the negative side, what’s more visible for church discipline purposes than saying “No, you can’t eat with us”?)

Now, there are deeper and more significant insights into what the above text means for our observation of the Lord’s Supper. I personally think it means we should abandon the ritualistic grape juice and cracker thing. But that’s for another time. The main point here is that we need to eat together more, in big groups and small. And that’s because we need to know each other more.

Oct
29
Posted by Daniel at 6:12 pm

Just installed a new theme. Maybe I can finally be happy with this one for a significant period of time. I tell you what, I’m theme-fickle.

Oct
29

I’m thinking about writing brief posts on practical, concrete steps for reforming the churches. I’ll lead with an easy one. It’s easy, but it’s controversial, especially with the elections for Caesar that are coming up next year.

Idea for Church Reform #1: No politics.

Here’s the first thing you do: take out the flags. No American flags, no Canadian flags, no Mexican flags, no Iranian flags, no Israeli flags, and no silly “Christian flags,” which don’t have any basis in Scripture and seem to me to be originated in the aping of the war-banners of governments.

The reason? We’re citizens of heaven, and who cares about our earthly citizenship? We can use it to get ourselves out of trouble (like Paul did), but it’s spiritually unimportant. Removing these national symbols can lead us to identify with our brothers around the world without fretting about the particulars of their civil oppressors.

Here’s another thing you do: stop talking about politics. That’s it: in the context of the church, it’s off limits. It divides and not based on doctrine. Instead, focus on civil/community action in terms of church, family, and individual. Don’t talk about passing this or that legislation, getting this or that guy or party into or out of office. Instead, talking about helping this person, offering to adopt these babies, caring for these widows and orphans.

Notice that that’s the kind of stuff the NT talks about? Notice how it’s completely unconcerned with political agitation? Maybe there’s something to that.

Sep
19
Posted by Daniel at 10:09 pm

Here’s the deal, self: you write at least a scene each day, and then, before you know it, you’ve got another book.